[Sneap] Ammeraal belts
Klaus Bahner
kgb at phys.au.dk
Mon Oct 15 09:45:07 EDT 2007
Pertti,
I remember dimly that an Ammeraal belt was tested years (a decade?) ago,
with mixed results perhaps depending on whether there is SF6 in you tank gas
or not. I believe there are some reports in old SNEAP proceedings. Of course
I don't remember which Ammeraal belt it was.
By the way, I'm not at all sure, because it is a long time ago, I looked
into Ammeraal belts, but if I remember Ammeraal Beltech's naming convention
correctly, the belt you cite is not "non-antistatic", which means it is
conductive, which makes it impossible using it in an accelerator. I may
remember Ammeraal's naming convention wrongly, though.
Regards,
Klaus Bahner
--------------------------------------------
AMS 14C Dating Laboratory
University of Aarhus
Ny Munkegade, Byg. 520
DK - 8000 Aarhus C
Phone: +45 8942 3736
Fax: +45 8612 0740
--------------------------------------------
>
> Hello,
>
> We are planning to try one of Ammeraal Beltech belts, namely
>
> Ropanyl EF 10/2 00+03 white M2 FG
>
> It looks quite similar to Siegling's white belt.
> Has anybody tested this belt as a charging belt?
>
> Best regards
>
> Pertti
>
> --
> Pertti O. Tikkanen, PhD
> Senior Laboratory Manager
>
> Accelerator Laboratory
> Department of Physical Sciences
> Box 43 (Pietari Kalmin katu 2)
> FIN 00014 University of Helsinki
>
> Office: +358 9 191 50006
> Telefax: +358 9 191 50042
> Mobile: +358 40 726 5386
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sneap mailing list
> Sneap at daytona.tunl.duke.edu
> http://daytona.tunl.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/sneap
>
More information about the Sneap
mailing list