[Sneap] Caesium Sputter Source and possible contamination from Ti hydride
Thomas A Brown
tabrown at llnl.gov
Wed Mar 5 11:01:20 EST 2008
Chris,
We have ongoing 3H AMS projects and run Ti-hydride targets in our
sources for those projects. We have found that running Ti-hydride in
the ion source does (is likely to) have an undesirable impact on
subsequent efforts to run 14C targets in the source. We routinely
consider just cleaning the source after Ti-hydride runs before
beginning further 14C runs. Our suspicions (which have included many
theories - some conflicting but coming from the same person) tend to
center on possible problems caused by the deposition of Ti (sputtered
neutral ions?) all over the surface of the ionizer - but hard
evidence is lacking.
Hope this helps.
Tom.
>Hi Guys
>Our SNICS Caesium sputter ion source is mainly used for C-14 Measurements.
>
>However, occasionally we use Ti-hydride targets for Proton beams.
> When we then go immediately back to measuring C-14 targets ( without
>opening the source for cleaning etc) and we appear to have stability
>problems etc.
>Are there issues with possible contamination of the Caesium or other
>reasons that people have experienced?
>i.e. is there evidence against using Ti-hydride on a sputter source used
>for C-14 AMS mainly ?
>
>Thanks
>Chris
>
>Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential. If received
>in error please destroy and immediately notify us. Do not copy or
>disclose the contents.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sneap mailing list
>Sneap at daytona.tunl.duke.edu
>http://daytona.tunl.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/sneap
--
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dr. Tom Brown
Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry
LLNL L-397 email: tabrown at llnl.gov
PO BOX 808 phone: (925)423-8507
7000 East Avenue fax: (925)423-7884
Livermore, CA 94551 LLNL pager: 51204
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
More information about the Sneap
mailing list